Glenn Greenwald wrote a concise exposé into the hypocrisy surrounding Bahrain and the United States. As Greenwald details, the gap between President Obama’s words and the actions of his administration is quite substantial.
Here’s the abbreviated version:
President Obama, March 19, 2011:
We cannot stand idly by when a tyrant tells his people there will be no mercy.
At least five protesters have been killed and hundreds wounded in a crackdown by Bahraini forces on Wednesday.
Human Rights Watch, yesterday:
Leading [Bahraini] political opposition figures have been sentenced to long prison terms, in some cases for life, solely for their role in organizing the large street protests.
The Pentagon’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency, September 14, 2011:
[America’s] DSCA notified Congress today of a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Government of Bahrain for Armored High Mobility Multi-Purpose Wheeled Vehicles, TOW Missiles and associated equipment, parts, training and logistical support worth an estimated $53 million.
So, why on earth would the American government sell weapons to merciless thugs who will, most certainly, use them on the civilian population? Well, the answer is in the DSCA’s press release itself:
This proposed sale will … improve the security of a major non-NATO ally that has been, and continues to be, an important force for political stability and economic progress in the Middle East.
In other words, Bahrain is loyal to America and it’s largest corporations. As long as the tiny country’s corrupt regime keeps playing the game, any butt-kickings issued by Bahrain’s security forces are free to be stamped with MADE IN THE USA.
Related Posts:
Tags: bahrain, corporation, east, imperialism, middle, states, united
Obama was a fraud from day one. I always ask his supporters: how is that hope and change coming? Just like his administration sold guns to the Mexican Cartel – the now infamous Fast and Furious scandal. So you should not be surprised by this Bahrain issue. Thanks for posting because I was not aware of it, though.